[Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Comparison between 4 different instruments]. / Determinación de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo realizada con 4 programas de cálculo distintos.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between left ventricular ejection fractions (EF) obtained using four different instruments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-five EF values were analysed. Gated acquisition was performed with the same gammacamera (SOPHA) using 99mTc-labelled red cells. Each EF was obtained using four processing systems: NXT (SOPHA), Entegra (Gems), Odyssey (Philips) and Esoft (Siemens), always working in automated mode. The paired student's t-test, Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare methods, and Deming regression was applied. RESULTS: Mean values and standard deviations for each program were: NXT: 61 +/- 9; Entegra: 60 +/- 10; Odyssey: 60 +/- 9; Esoft: 60 +/- 10. Although no significant differences were found as a whole and the values were linearly related, the methods are not interchangeable. CONCLUSIONS: The same program should be used in the follow-up of each patient, which is now easily achievable by means of the DICOM standard.

Determinación de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo realizada con 4 programas de cálculo distintos / Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Comparison between 4 different instruments

Objetivo. Analizar la relación existente entre los valores de la fracción de eyección (FE) del ventrículo izquierdo obtenidos mediante ventriculografía isotópica en equilibrio utilizando cuatro equipos de procesado distintos. Material y métodos. Se han estudiado 85 FE. Las adquisiciones se realizaron en una única gammacámara (Sopha®) mediante sincronización con el electrocardiograma (ECG) y utilizando hematíes marcados con Tc-99m. Se ha obtenido cada una de las FE por cuatro sistemas de procesado: NXT (Sopha®), Entegra (Gems®), Odissey (Philips®) y Esoft (Siemens®). El modo empleado por defecto era el de cálculo automático. Se aplicó la prueba de comparación de medias para datos apareados agrupando las 4 series de datos dos a dos. Asimismo, se buscó la correlación de Spearman y se aplicó la prueba de Bland-Altman para intercambiabilidad y se analizó su regresión por el método de Deming. Resultados. Los valores medios ± desviación estándar según cada programa fueron: NXT: 61 ± 9, Entegra: 60 ± 10, Odyssey: 60 ± 9, Esoft: 60 ± 10. No se han detectado globalmente diferencias, pero los 4 programas generan valores no intercambiables entre sí. Conclusiones. Aunque linealmente relacionados y sin diferencias significativas, se concluye que si se han de comparar estudios de un mismo paciente se emplee el mismo programa, cosa actualmente factible mediante el formato DICOM

Aim. The aim of this study was to analyse therelationship between left ventricular ejection fractions (EF) obtained using four different instruments.Material and methods. Eighty-five EF values were analysed. Gated acquisition was performed with the same gammacamera (SOPHA®) using 99mTc-labelled red cells. Each EF was obtained using four processing systems: NXT (SOPHA®), Entegra (Gems®), Odyssey (Philips®) and Esoft (Siemens®), always working in automated mode.The paired student’s t-test, Spearman correlation andBland-Altman analysis were used to compare methods,and Deming regression was applied. Results. Mean values and standard deviations for each program were: NXT: 61 ± 9; Entegra: 60 ± 10; Odyssey: 60 ± 9; Esoft: 60 ± 10.Although no significant differences were found as a wholeand the values were linearly related, the methods are not interchangeable. Conclusions. The same program should be used in the follow- up of each patient, which is now easily achievable by means of the DICOM standard (AU)